Put out that blunt! Turn off the torch!! Pour out some of that bong-water for the lost dollars you’ve spent on top-shelf, high- THC bud!!!
Not only does THC content have nothing to do with how “good” the weed is, as recent research conducted by the University of Colorado and published in JAMA Psychiatry found, THC content is also a poor indicator of potency.
High-THC weed doesn’t even get you “more high”!
Researchers at the University of Colorado at Boulder’s Institute of Cognitive Science documented the experiences of 121 cannabis users. Half the study participants were users of cannabis concentrates—very-high THC cannabis extracts—and the other half preferred cannabis flower.
Both groups received cannabis at varying “strengths”: flower users tried cannabis flower at either 16 percent or 24 percent THC, and extract users received oil at either 70 percent or 90 percent THC. Researchers checked study participants’ blood and monitored their mood, cognitive function, and intoxication level before, immediately after, and one hour after use.
As the researchers expected, the concentrate users had very high levels of THC in their bodies after use. But they weren’t “more high.”
In fact, every participants’ self-reported “highness” was about the same—“as were their measures of balance and cognitive impairment,” as CU noted in a news release. Medium THC flower, high-THC flower—all the same high! This was not what the researchers were expecting.
“People in the high concentration group were much less compromised than we thought they would be,” said coauthor Kent Hutchinson, a professor of psychology who studies addiction, in a CU news release. “If we gave people that high a concentration of alcohol it would have been a different story.”
Consider the cannabis flower users. Sixteen percent THC compared to 24 percent THC is a big difference—50 percent “stronger.” How can users of such differnet “strength” products report such similar psychoactive effects?
The short answer is a theory that cannabis connoisseurs and cannabis scientists have been saying for years: There are many more factors at play than THC. Put slightly longer: Judging a cannabis strain on its THC content is not unlike judging a film based on the lead actor. The THC number isn’t going to be an indicator of the performance.
(One very large exception to this: edibles. If one edible says it has 100 milligrams of THC, and another says it has 10 milligrams, and you eat the 100, you will absolutely be higher, longer, than if you ate the 10.)
There are a host of cannabinoids, including CBD as well as more than 100 others—most of which aren’t even tested for. (Even if they were, would the average buyer know what to do?)
There are also aromatic compounds called terpenes that dictate how cannabis affects the mind and body. All of these work in concert, a phenomenon known as “the entourage effect.” This is why synthetic THC simply didn’t have the same medical effects as smoking weed.
A good way—maybe the best way—to determine if cannabis will be good, or at least good for you, is to smell it. But in legal markets like California, that’s now impossible. Pot is sold in prepackaged containers. And the coronavirus pandemic eliminated what limited opportunities there were to smell cannabis. Some shops let you wave under your nose a designated “smell jar”—a few buds in a container with a perforated lid. No longer.
Are YOU a Jeep-guy? Not so much? How about guitars, that rev your engine? If not cars or guitars, we have Star Wars! Trek? Tech? Ticky? Tacky?? Josh really planted one this morning, wondering about the things we identify with and as, were they ingrained, or implanted? Are we just the sum of all our...
We ask LC King. And Zack. And you! Our guest (and friend!) Lucas is here today, discussing an engine he built. No, this isn’t a modded hot rod engine, or made for bio-diesel, no, this engine runs on water. Yes, water. And just about anything else he threw at it. Zack was explaining the GEET...
I DID say today’s description would be all links! We had so many great comments and links in chat today, including a way to finally find freedom from fiat and be fiscally flush (See Doc’s links below!!) that to have NOT included these links would have been a crime! Science loves DEMONS: https://www.newyorker.com/books/under-review/sciences-demons-from-descartes-to-darwin-and-beyond Demon emojis...
We hit the ground hard with feeling this Friday, lots of raw emotion over lots of raw shite. Folks are fed up, as are the hosts, reflected back as we try to keep up with all the genius-level commentary flowing through our flat-chat. –Blood once again seems to be the key, thanx Liz!! Shocking!!! –Sit...
We are back! Back to the normal flow of our Abby Normal show…as normal as we can be in a whirled where normal is insanity, sanity is a conspiracy, and conspiratio doctrina fecit carpe diem…wait, what?? We review a bit of what has been, talk a bit of what could be, and have a lot...
Get out your scrying mirror fondle-slab and get ready to look into the far-reaching future of…3 days from now!! See what wonders the future holds for us Neolithic hangers-on as we are swept away by time’s white-water rapids! Flying cars? Communicator watches?? Talking refrigerators…with TVs built right in??? You ARE the future, so lose the...