(Daniel Jennings) Opponents of eminent domain won an important victory this week when the US Supreme Court ruled against a city that had ordered removal of an anti-eminent domain sign.
The justices did this by vacating a US Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling and then ordering the court to reconsider a decision that had allowed the city of Norfolk, Virginia, to tell a private business to remove the sign. The Supreme Court’s order was unsigned and only four sentences.
“This is a twin victory for free speech and property rights,” Michael Bindas, a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, said of the Supreme Court’s action in Central Radio Company v. City of Norfolk.
The case began in 2010 when the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority tried to use eminentdomain to seize the property owned by Central Radio Inc., a family-owned business, and turn it over to Old Dominion University. Not surprisingly Central Radio’s owners, the Wilson family, fought back.
One of the ways they protested was to put a large banner containing the American flag and the following statement on their building: “50 years on this street/78 years in Norfolk/100 workers/Threatened by eminent domain!”
The 365-square-foot banner faced Hampton Boulevard, which the Fourth Circuit Court described as a major six-lane highway. The banner was designed to be visible several blocks away.
Shortly after the Wilsons put up the banner, an unidentified official at Old Dominion University, the very institution that would profit from the land grab, filed a complaint with the city of Norfolk,Washington Postblogger Radley Balko reported. The city’s zoning officials ordered the Wilsons to remove the banner, contending it violated the sign code because it was too big and threatened “public safety.”
Story continues below the video
The Wilsons covered the sign to prevent $1,000-a-day fines and challenged the city’s action by filing a federal lawsuit with the help of the Institute in May 2012. In their suit, the businesspeople contended that the city violated their First Amendment right to free speech and their 14thAmendment right to equal protection under the law.
“The plaintiffs alleged that the sign code was unconstitutional because it subjected their display to size and location restrictions, but exempted certain ‘flag[s] or emblem[s]’ and ‘works of art’ from any similar limitations,” Judge Barbara Milano Keenan wrote in the Fourth Circuit’s opinion.
Supreme Court Expands Free Speech
Both a US district court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with Norfolk and said the city’s policy was constitutional. The Supreme Court, though, disagreed and said the Fourth Circuit’s decision may conflict with a new Supreme Court decision, Reed vs. Town of Gilbert, Arizona. In that case, the US Supreme Court ruled that codes that ban or regulate signs based upon content are unconstitutional.
The Reed case involved a church that used lawn signs to advertise the location of its services. A town had ordered the congregation to remove the signs.
“Because the Code, on its face, is a content-based regulation of speech, there is no need to consider the government’s justifications or purposes for enacting the Code to determine whether it is subject to strict scrutiny,” Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in Reed.
Said Robert Frommer, an Institute for Justice attorney, “The Supreme Court has made clear that government does not get to play favorites with the First Amendment by arbitrarily deciding who gets to speak and what they get to say.”
The Virginia-Pilot newspaper called the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Norfolk case a victory “for anyone who believes in the right to speak out when government abuses its power.”
Ironically enough, the Wilsons and their employees at Central Radio no longer have to worry about eminent domain. In 2013 the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that the city’s attempt to take their land was illegal under state law and effectively ended the land grab.
NOTICE OF DATA BREACH Dear User, We are writing to inform you about a data security issue that may involve your Yahoo account information. What Happened? A copy of certain user account information was stolen from our systems in late 2014 by what we believe is a state-sponsored actor. We are closely coordinating with law...
12:15am EDT Breaking News The hashtag #GasShortage is trending on twitter for Tennessee. It will soon be trending elsewhere. My brother reported to me a few minutes ago that Gas stations in Greensboro NC are out of gas and those truck stops have only about 7000 Gallons as of 1155pm EST. The immediate...
World Peace: The Final Chapter By Brooks Agnew Notes from 04 September 2016 World peace has been cited by pageant misses as their life’s work for more than a century. It is the stuff of happily ever fairy tales and Mendala shifting Disney movies. Guard dropping press releases misled Neville Chamberlain and countless other kings to...
Forgiveness by Luckee1 as heard on 30 August 2016 http://tfrlive.com/luckee-with-truth-frequency-news-66847/ I know when I was a girl, I was told that we had to forgive others. The adults, especially those associated with church, always talked about forgiving others. They also talked about how Jesus died for our forgiveness. They would talk about things like forgive your...
Original post is: Watch as amazing GcMAF treatment kills cancer cells in real time… holistic doctors ‘suicided’ over this stunning breakthrough A breakthrough cancer treatment appears to be the reason why a handful of holistic doctors were recently found “suicided” is now gaining worldwide attention as a potential universal cure for cancer. And new microscopic...